This slashes your management overhead and keeps your architecture cleaner. This is perfect when you’ve got microservices or containerized apps where different services handle different parts of your application. If one AWS zone fails, your NLB instances in other zones keep operating independently, providing true high availability without cross-zone failures. If your infrastructure consists of separate services, each mapped to a distinct URL, and you need basic load balancing, then the Classic ELB is a solid choice.

When you create an ALB, you must specify in which availability zones (one subnet per availability zone) you will “enable” it. This means that the ALB will only be able https://limefx.name/ to distribute traffic to the enabled availability zones. ALBs, NLBs, and GLBs operate at different layers of your network communication. An ALB operates on OSI layer 7 and allows for application-level traffic manipulation and routing. An NLB operates on layer 4 for network-level traffic management based on ports and IP addresses. A GLB works across layers 3 and 7, providing balancing and routing services at the network level along with gateway functionality.

But, if you’re working with microservices and containerized applications or need advanced routing capabilities, ALB is the better option. With content-based routing, multiple target groups, and deeper AWS service integration, ALB offers greater flexibility and scalability for modern cloud-native environments. A GLB is ideal when you’re balancing on the network gateway level. For example, a GLB works well if you manage traffic between cloud and on-premises environments or across different regions.

What are the Differences Between ALB and NLB?

Because it combines OSI layers 3 and 4 balancing, it can route traffic between distinct regions and networks. Because it supports IP-based routing, it can distribute traffic across virtual gateways, so it can offer high scalability and availability. The target type is the endpoint that each of these load balancers routes traffic to. An ALB works with IP addresses, instance, and AWS Lambda target types. NLBs work with IPs and instances, and they can also route traffic to an ALB for more complex requests.

You can define rules to route common traffic to an entire group. For example, you can create a target group for general requests and other target groups for requests to the microservices for your application. Network Load Balancer is designed to work within a single availability zone. If one availability zone goes down, NLB will route traffic to other available zones.

Did you know that according to a study by AWS, nearly 90% of companies leveraging cloud resources report improved performance and higher availability? This just goes to show how essential proper load balancing is for a smooth application experience. Selecting the right load balancer can make or break your app’s performance, especially in today’s fast-paced tech world. A subpar choice could lead to laggy websites, unhappy users, or even financial loss.

An NLB supports TCP, UDP, and TLS protocols, which covers network-level traffic distributions. Finally, a GLB covers IP-based routing, handling any IP-based protocols. Choosing the right load balancer for your AWS architecture requires understanding the distinct capabilities of both NLB and ALB. Network Load Balancers excel in high-performance scenarios requiring TCP/UDP traffic handling, static IP addresses, and ultra-low latency. I would use ALB for almost any web application where HTTP/S traffic needs to be distributed to different targets like EC2 instances, IP addresses, or Lambda functions.

When authentication is configured for specific ALB listeners, the load balancer will always authenticate requests before routing traffic to targets. By implementing authentication at the load balancer level, you can focus more on business logic in your target instances. These load balancers are client contact points and help improve application scalability with secure management. You can choose one or multiple load balancers and configure them when you’re setting up ELB for your cloud environment. Terminating the flow enables load balancers to perform additional traffic management functions, such as SSL termination, session persistence, and content-based routing. The NLB monitors the health of its registered targets and routes traffic only to the healthy targets.

Security Forem

NLB can be created in only one availability zone, whereas with ALB, a minimum of two availability zones must be enabled to create a load balancer. Ultimately, your architectural requirements should guide your decision. For applications demanding maximum throughput and consistent performance, NLB may be your best choice.

NLBs are optimized for handling millions of requests per second, operating at Layer 4 (Transport Layer). This means they’re all about TCP, UDP, and TLS traffic, ideal for applications requiring quick response times. NLB is the speed demon, maintaining ultra-low latency even as connections multiply. If your future includes high-throughput streaming or real-time applications, NLB won’t become your bottleneck.

Comparing ALB and NLB

ALB costs more but handles application-layer tasks that would otherwise require extra compute resources. NLB is cheaper per hour but might push complexity (and costs) to your application servers. NLB handles what ALB can’t – UDP traffic and static IP addresses. You can centralize your SSL certificates at the ALB level instead of managing them on each backend server.

A GLB uses routing table look-ups to determine where to route the traffic. When choosing between Network Load Balancer (NLB) and Application Load Balancer (ALB) on AWS, the stakes are higher than most realize. One handles millions of requests per second at ultra-low latency, while the other inspects application-layer traffic with sophisticated routing rules.

Round-Robin vs Flow Hash Routing Algorithm

• Sticky sessions are a mechanism to route requests from the same client to the same target.
• Both load balancers support security groups, which you can use to control the traffic allowed to reach your targets (such as EC2 instances, IP addresses, etc.).
• Unlock the full potential of your applications with Google Cloud Platform’s edge services!
• Spark creativity and collaboration in any learning environment with a variety of Microsoft 365 apps and free templates to choose from.
• The OSI model is a conceptual framework that facilitates communication between different computing systems by segmenting them into seven layers.
• A fundamental difference between AWS ELB and ALB is how they handle and route requests, which is best understood through the Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) model.

By using this hash, the algorithm routes traffic to the same target for the duration of the connection. Sticky sessions are a mechanism to route requests from the same client to the same target. Elastic Load Balancer is designed to handle traffic as it grows and can load balance millions of requests/sec. Moving on to Network Load Balancers—if speed and efficiency are your goals, you may want to give NLB a shot.

NLB simply forwards packets without inspecting them deeply – making it lightning fast but less feature-rich. It’s like choosing between a sports car (NLB) and an SUV with all the fancy features (ALB). The dynamic port mapping feature is a game-changer for containerized apps. As containers spin up and down, ALB automatically detects the ports and adjusts routing accordingly. In 2016, AWS augmented its Classic ELB offering with an Application Load Balancer (ALB).

• This gives your applications visibility into who’s actually connecting, which can be crucial for security and analytics.
• Your clients connect directly to your backend instances through the NLB, preserving source IP addresses.
• NLBs work with IPs and instances, and they can also route traffic to an ALB for more complex requests.
• This means ALB must inspect and process the content of HTTP/HTTPS requests and additionally decrypt and re-encrypt HTTPS traffic (see TLS Termination).

The main difference lies in how the load balancers are built. ALB operates at the application level (OSI Layer 7), while NLB operates at the network level (OSI Layer 4). This means ALB must inspect and process the content of HTTP/HTTPS requests and additionally decrypt and re-encrypt HTTPS traffic (see TLS Termination). When comparing latency between the two load balancers, NLB is the clear winner. However, it’s important to note that for most web-based applications, the latency provided by ALB is perfectly sufficient. But if you require extremely low latency for real-time applications, such as gaming, video streaming or financial transactions, NLB is the better choice.

It can peek inside HTTP requests and route traffic based on paths, headers, or query strings – perfect for microservices architectures. Certain application architectures may require zonal isolation. For example, single-AZ web applications may need traffic to be distributed only within a specific availability zone to minimize latency and avoid data transfer costs.

These high-traffic volumes require many resource servers with duplicate data. To redirect application traffic, ALBs examine the requested content, such as HTTP headers or SSL session IDs. NLBs examine IP addresses and other network information to redirect traffic optimally.

Elastic Load Balancing features

But ALB takes it a step further with view/edit rules, where you can manage routing logic. The Application Load Balancer (ALB) performs TLS termination when you create an HTTPS listener. Similarly, the Network Load Balancer (NLB) performs TLS termination when you create a TLS listener. Keep in mind that if you use a different listener, such as TCP, then encrypted traffic will be forwarded (pass-through) to the targets, and traffic decryption will occur there. Existing flows continue to go to existing target appliances, new flows are rerouted to healthy target appliances.

For unpredictable workloads with extreme peaks, NLB won’t break a sweat. Path-based routing makes ALB perfect for container deployments limefx website where different services handle different API endpoints. Your clients connect directly to your backend instances through the NLB, preserving source IP addresses. This gives your applications visibility into who’s actually connecting, which can be crucial for security and analytics.

Once you’ve set up an AWS ALB, you can access its advanced configuration settings within the AWS Management Console. After going to the Load Balancer section on the EC2 home page, you can create and modify load balancers as needed. It’s easy to configure, making it a popular choice among AWS engineers who are familiar with its capabilities. If your environment consists of clearly defined services mapped to specific addresses, then the Classic ELB is the logical choice. A fundamental difference between AWS ELB and ALB is how they handle and route requests, which is best understood through the Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) model.

However, NLB operates at the transport layer (Layer 4) and does not support advanced routing rules like ALB. You can select the appropriate load balancer based on your application needs. If you need flexible application management, we recommend that you use an Application Load Balancer. If extreme performance and static IP is needed for your application, we recommend that you use a Network Load Balancer.

If you need advanced routing features, integration with AWS WAF, support for HTTP/HTTPS protocols, and the ability to invoke AWS Lambda functions directly, ALB is the way to go. As organizations adopt microservices architectures and container-based infrastructure, mapping a single address to a specific service becomes more complicated and harder to maintain. Unlike classic ELB, which routes requests solely based on protocol and port, ALB routes are based on request content. Beyond traffic distribution, ELB maintains service reliability. As I mentioned previously, like ALB, NLB also serves a specific purpose. AWS wouldn’t provide two similar load balancers that essentially do the same thing at the same cost.

If you have an existing application that was built within the EC2-Classic network, then you should use a Classic Load Balancer. Modern web apps need real-time communication, and ALB delivers with full WebSocket support. Your chat applications, live dashboards, and gaming platforms can maintain persistent connections without the headaches. NLB can process millions of requests per second with ultra-low latency (often just microseconds). It maintains a direct connection between client and server using the same connection for the duration of a session.